Factors impacting nursing assistants to accept a delegation in the acute care settings: A mixed method study.

AIMS: To investigate the experience of nursing assistants being delegated nursing tasks by registered nurses. DESIGN: Mixed method explanatory sequential design. METHODS: A total of 79 nursing assistants working in an acute hospital in Australia completed surveys that aimed to identify their experience of working with nurses and the activities they were delegated. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Interviews with 11 nursing assistants were conducted and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results were triangulated to provide a richer understanding of the phenomena. RESULTS: Most nursing assistants felt supported completing delegated care activities. However, there was confusion around their scope of practice, some felt overworked and believed that they did not have the right to refuse a delegation. Factors impacting the nursing assistant's decision to accept a delegation included the attitude of the nurses, wanting to be part of the team and the culture of the ward. Nursing assistants who were studying to be nurses felt more supported than those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Delegation is a two-way relationship and both parties need to be cognisant of their roles and responsibilities to ensure safe and effective nursing care is provided. Incorrectly accepting or refusing delegated activities may impact patient safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Highlights the need for implementing strategies to support safe delegation practices between the registered and unregulated workforce to promote patient safety. IMPACT: Describes the experiences of nursing assistants working in the acute care environment when accepting delegated care from nurses. Reports a range of factors that inhibit or facilitate effective delegation practices between nurses and nursing assistants. Provides evidence to support the need for stronger education and policy development regarding delegation practices between nurses and unregulated staff. REPORTING METHOD: Complied with the APA Style JARS-MIXED reporting criteria for mixed method research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Clinical deterioration as a nurse sensitive indicator in the out-of-hospital context: A scoping review.

AIMS: To explore and summarise the literature on the concept of 'clinical deterioration' as a nurse-sensitive indicator of quality of care in the out-of-hospital context. DESIGN: The scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review and the JBI best practice guidelines for scoping reviews. METHODS: Studies focusing on clinical deterioration, errors of omission, nurse sensitive indicators and the quality of nursing and midwifery care for all categories of registered, enrolled, or licensed practice nurses and midwives in the out-of-hospital context were included regardless of methodology. Text and opinion papers were also considered. Study protocols were excluded. DATA SOURCES: Data bases were searched from inception to June 2022 and included CINAHL, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, EmCare, Maternity and Infant Care Database, Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, Informit Health and Society Database, JSTOR, Nursing and Allied Health Database, RURAL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. Workloads, education and training opportunities, access to technology, home visits, clinical assessments and use of screening tools or guidelines impacted the ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out-of-hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the work of nurses or midwives in out-of-hospital settings and their recognition, reaction to and relay of information about patient deterioration. The complex and subtle nature of non-acute deterioration creates challenges in defining and subsequently evaluating the role and impact of nurses in these settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Further research is needed to clarify outcome measures and nurse contribution to the care of the deteriorating patient in the out-of-hospital setting to reduce the rate of avoidable hospitalisation and articulate the contribution of nurses and midwives to patient care. IMPACT: What Problem Did the Study Address? Factors that impact a nurse's ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out-of-hospital setting are not examined to date. What Were the Main Findings? A range of factors were identified that impacted a nurse's ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out-of-hospital setting including workloads, education and training opportunities, access to technology, home visits, clinical assessments, use of screening tools or guidelines, and avoidable hospitalisation. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurses and nursing management will benefit from understanding the factors that act as barriers and facilitators for effective recognition of, and responding to, a deteriorating patient in the out-of-hospital setting. This in turn will impact patient survival and satisfaction. REPORTING METHOD: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review guidelines guided this review. The PRISMA-Scr Checklist (Tricco et al., 2018) is included as (supplementary file 1).Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study." NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not required as the Scoping Review used publicly available information.

Integrative review: Factors impacting effective delegation practices by registered nurses to assistants in nursing.

AIM: To identify the evidence on factors that impact delegation practices by Registered Nurses to Assistants in Nursing in acute care hospitals. DESIGN: An integrative review. DATA SOURCES: Database searches were conducted between July 2011 and July 2021. REVIEW METHODS: We used the 12-step approach by Kable and colleagues to document the search strategy. The (Whittemore & Knafl. 2005. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553) integrative review framework method was adopted and the methodological quality of the studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs critical appraisal instruments. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Delegation between the Registered Nurse and the Assistant in Nursing is a complex but critical leadership skill which is impacted by the Registered Nurse's understanding of the Assistant in Nursing's role, scope of practice and job description. Newly qualified nurses lacked the necessary leadership skills to delegate. Further education on delegation is required in pre-registration studies and during nurses' careers to ensure Registered Nurses are equipped with the skills and knowledge to delegate effectively. CONCLUSION: With increasing numbers of Assistants in Nursing working in the acute care environment, it is essential that Registered Nurses are equipped with the appropriate leadership skills to ensure safe delegation practice.

Factors impacting delegation decision making by registered nurses to assistants in nursing in the acute care setting: A mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare organisations have been redesigning care delivery models in an attempt to extend, expand and supplement the registered nurse workforce by including more unregulated healthcare workers, such as the assistant-in-nursing. As the number of assistants-in-nursing grows it is essential that nurses have the requisite skills and knowledge to effectively delegate and supervise this growing workforce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to explore the factors that impact the nurse's decision to delegate to assistant-in-nursing in the acute care environment. DESIGN: This study used a mixed-method explanatory sequential design. The participants were RNs in an acute public hospital in Western Australia. The surveys completed by the registered nurses (n = 100) included their attitude to delegation, the risk management process undertaken prior to delegation and the tasks that they delegated to the assistants-in-nursing. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings from these data informed the questions for the semi structured interviews which formed the second phase of this research. Interviews with registered nurses (n = 12) were conducted, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results from both phases were triangulated to provide a richer understanding of the phenomena. RESULTS: Overall, approximately half have a 'somewhat negative attitude' (n = 45, 45%); and the other half have a 'somewhat positive attitude' (n = 48, 48%) towards delegation. Concerningly, many nurses do not complete a risk assessment prior to delegating to the assistant-in-nursing. This study identified a range of factors that impact nurses' decision to delegate to the assistant-in-nursing including their level of experience, level of education pertaining to delegation, the assistant-in-nursing skills, knowledge and attributes, and the individual nurses' personality traits. CONCLUSIONS: As demand and financial constraints on healthcare systems increase, governments and health care providers are needing to reconsider how to deliver effective, cost efficient healthcare in the acute care environment. As models of care evolve to include more unregulated workers it is essential that safe, effective delegation practices occur between registered nurses and the assistant-in-nursing.

The effect of an enrolled nursing registration pathway program on undergraduate nursing students' confidence level: A pre- and post-test study.

BACKGROUND: In the latter half of the 20th century, registered nurse education moved to university degree level. As a result, there has been a reduction in access for students to clinical experience. In numerous studies, nursing graduates have reported that they do not feel prepared for practice. The importance of maximising every learning opportunity during nursing school is paramount. At Edith Cowan University, a program was initiated that allows students to become enrolled nurses at the midway point of their degree to enable them to work and therefore gain experience in the clinical practice setting during their education. This study investigated the effect of the program on the nursing students' perception of their clinical abilities and explored their ability to link theory to practice. METHODS: The research design for this study was a quasi-experimental, prospective observational cohort study. The study included 39 second-year nursing students not enrolled in the program (Group 1), 45 second-year nursing students enrolled in the program (Group 2), and 28 third-year nursing students who completed the program and are working as enrolled nurses (Group 3). Participants were asked to complete a Five Dimension of Nursing Scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The quantitative analyses showed that students in Group 1 had statistically significant higher pre-questionnaire perceived abilities across all domains, except in two dimensions when compared to Group 2. The post-questionnaire analysis showed that Group 1 had statistically significant lower perceived abilities in four of the five dimensions compared to Group 2. Group 1 also had significantly lower abilities in all dimensions compared to Group 3. Group 3 had a significantly higher perception of their clinical abilities compared to Group 2. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the value of meaningful employment for undergraduate nursing students by providing opportunities to increase confidence in clinical abilities.